So let's recap. We've read the first paragraph of the Abstract. This had four sentences briefly stating what was the main theoretical argument of the article. Then we read the first sentence of the second paragraph, in which the author refers to three organizations (ie 3 case studies). We quickly looked through the article to where the discussion of the case studies began, as indicated by a subheading (page 160). These were briefly introduced, so we discovered something about each organization. We then quickly scanned forward to find out where each case study was discussed. We didn't read much - just enough to get an overview. Now we're back at the Abstract, at the second sentence of the second paragraph. As you can see, it's the final sentence of the Abstract. The final sentence of the abstract begins: OK, from reading just the abstract, and looking in the article to find where certain items referred to in the abstract are discussed in more details, we are already able to put some 'flesh' on the 'skeleton' of the article: |
Title: "Accounting, Budgeting and Control Systems in their Organizational Context: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives |
Author details: author is an academic at UCLA |
Abstract |
Introduction |
Theoretical discussion budgeting and even an accounting system cannot be viewed as a control system per se; rather, they must be seen as a part of a carefully designed total system of organizational control." "If |
Presentation and discussion of empirical findings three case studies: 1) medium sized residential real estate company dealing with 'a traditional system for budgetary control' 2) small distributor of industrial abrasives, concerning the 'ability of an accounting system to function as part of the overall organizational control system'. 3) very large US financial institution: - attempt to introduce a zero- based budgeting system. |
Conclusion the need for: "a different orientation of the role that accounting and budgeting play in the control process". "a broader concept of control itself." |
Bibliography |
All this from just a short amount of work. Read the title and think about it. Read the Abstract and think about it. Quickly locate where key elements mentioned in the Abstract are situated in the article. About 5 minutes work maximum. Yes, it's taken longer than that to go through the process on these webpages, but if you do it by yourself it's just a few minute's work to get a good understanding of what the article is about and how it is structured. Now, and only now, is it appropriate to start to read the article in more depth. In fact, it may be worthwhile just pausing for a minute or two at this point. Take a sip of a drink; make some brief notes; congratulate yourself. Then, when you are ready, go on to the next stage
|